Tag Archives: Matthew Ruff Wins DUI Case

The .25 BAC Illusion: How a Torrance DUI Attorney Exposed the “One-Walk-Through” Police Lie

The prosecution’s case against Matthew’s client seemed airtight, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.25%—exceeding the legal limit. Yet, through meticulous scrutiny, DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff unveiled a critical flaw: the arresting officer lacked formal training and certification for the breath test device in question. This oversight exposed a systemic issue within California’s Title 17 regulations, casting doubt on the validity of the high BAC readings. Ultimately, the prosecution’s evidence crumbled, and the administrative action against the driver was dismissed, underscoring the importance of proper training and adherence to legal procedures. Continue reading

Posted in criminal, DMV, DUI, Legal Resources, Torrance Judges, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Power of the 4th Amendment: How a .22% BAC DUI Was Reduced to “Wet Reckless”

Top DUI attorney Matthew Ruff recently secured a reduction to ‘wet reckless’ by challenging police detention and breath test integrity. His client, despite a .22% BAC, was held for nearly three times the legal limit, yet Ruff argued unconstitutional violations. The case started when a Kern County Deputy found a vehicle off the road, with no evidence of impairment. Ruff’s motion to suppress evidence highlighted unlawful prolonged detention and lack of probable cause, proving the arrest lacked legitimacy. Continue reading

Posted in criminal, DMV, DUI, Legal Resources, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Matthew Ruff Defeats DUI “Refusal” Suspension by Challenging Unsanitary Hospital Conditions

Matthew Ruff, a leading DUI attorney in Torrance, achieved a monumental victory for his client in a high-stakes DMV Administrative Hearing. Through a meticulous legal challenge, Matthew successfully argued that the client’s decision to refuse a blood draw under unsanitary conditions was a legally protected objection, rather than a mere refusal. This victory, secured by leveraging the landmark California case Ross v. DMV, demonstrates the importance of ensuring driver safety and the right to assurances during traffic stops. The DMV Hearing Officer was presented with compelling evidence that the arresting deputies failed to meet their statutory obligations, including providing factual basis for breath test availability and substantiating the claim of recanted consent. As a result, the DMV issued an official Order of Set Aside, vacating the one-year Continue reading

Posted in criminal, DMV, DUI, Legal Resources, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment