In California, the general rule is that the District Attorney can only refile a felony case once after the charges have been dismissed. However, there are some exceptions. For example, Penal Code §1387.1 provides a statutory exception to the two dismissal rule for defendants charged with violent felonies as defined in Pen C §667.5. If either of the first two dismissals were for excusable neglect, the prosecution may be permitted one additional opportunity to refile the charges. But no additional refiling is allowed if the conduct of the prosecution amounted to bad faith. Pen C §1387.1(a). Excusable neglect includes, but is not limited to, error on the part of the court, prosecution, law enforcement, or witnesses. Pen C §1387.1(b); see People v Massey (2000) 79 CA4th 204 (defining excusable neglect as neglect that might have been the act or omission of a reasonably prudent person under the same or similar circumstances, e.g., prosecution’s failure to have witnesses in court on date set for trial after making reasonable efforts to secure their attendance); People v Mason (2006) 140 CA4th 1190, 1196–1197 (excusable neglect shown when victim witness was unavailable without knowledge of prosecutor and after numerous postponements where victim had been available, which gave prosecutor reason to believe victim would be available). For the violent felony exception to apply, the violent felony offense for which charges may be refiled must be one of the charged offenses previously dismissed. Otherwise, the prosecution could avoid the statutory consequence of two prior dismissals by overcharging an offense in a third filing. This is permitted under law by the ruling in People vs. Salcido (2008) 166 CA4th 1303, 1312–1313. In cases where the prosecution intends to refile a felony charge, it is imperative to find an attorney who will aggressively challenge the efforts of the D.A. It must be remembered that this only applies to felony criminal cases, misdemeanors are governed by different rules and laws, consult a Torrance Criminal Lawyer for help in these situations.
-
Recent Posts
- What does the status code “ambient fail” mean on the Datamaster DMT Breath Machine?
- What is a “blank error” on the Datamaster DMT Breath Machine?
- Can a DUI Prevent You From Entering Canada?
- Is Low Volume In A DUI Blood Vial A Potential Defense?
- MUST a Marine Corps Reservist self-report a DUI Arrest that occurred while the Marine was NOT on duty (in status)?
Recent Comments
Seth on A New Way To Treat Alcoho… John on Matthew Ruff Explains What to… skrapnoid on New California Judicial Divers… David LaFond on New 2020 Legislation On Pitche… Paula on What is a Serna Motion? Archives
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- May 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- August 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- July 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
Categories
Meta
There are two aspects to this civil and craimnil. On the craimnil side, it’s a crime only if the State is able to prove that he did not intend to pay for the items. If he used the company card with the intent of paying the bill when it arrived, it’s not illegal although it’s a violation of company rules, I’m sure. These cases are seldom prosecuted simply because unless you missed these charges over a period of several months and he never paid them it’s hard to show intent.On the civil side, you can sue him. You’re entitled to your $1,900 plus costs. My personal opinion First, report him to the cops. The craimnil issue is entirely in their hands and the DA’s anyway. You don’t need a lawyer to do that.Second, demand your $1,900 back. If he doesn’t pay up, sue him in small claims court. You don’t need a lawyer to do that either. No point giving your lawyer $500 that you can’t add to your claim. In *some* States, but only a few, it’s legal to withhold a sum like this from his last paycheck. That is not true in most States, though and if you try it one where it’s not legal (Like my State of CA) it will cost you big time if he sues you.Third of course fire him.Richard