U.S. Supreme Court Throws Out Murder Case Because D.A. Hid Evidence

In criminal law cases are very rarely thrown out on appeal, in murder cases it is almost unheard of, according to Torrance Criminal Attorney  Matthew Ruff.   In a very brief opinion, the US Supreme Court (8-1) reversed a conviction for five counts of first-degree murder because the prosecutor engaged in unscrupulous conduct.   The only evidence of the defendant’s guilt was a single eyewitness, who told the jury the defendant was the guy.  The D.A. failed to disclose the eyewitness’s two prior statements that he couldn’t see the shooter.  The information was clearly favorable and not disclosed.  So the only issue was materiality.  The Justices said the evidence was indeed important and would likely have resulted in an acquittal (materiality). The Court does an excellent job of explaining why this information was material.  This is over a dissent by Thomas.    Smith v. Cain; 2012  132 S.Ct. 627.

About thetorranceattorney

Matthew Ruff is a Torrance criminal defense attorney located near the 405 freeway on Crenshaw Blvd. Focusing on DUI and serious criminal cases for over twenty years. In addition to criminal cases, Matthew also defends clients at the DMV.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s