When you face the power of the State in a courtroom, the stakes couldn’t be higher. A DUI charge is more than just a legal hurdle; it’s a threat to your reputation, your career, and your freedom. Today, we’re looking back at a past jury trial defended by Torrance DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff. The case of The People of the State of California vs. Diaz (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 7SC02***) a case, presided over by the Honorable Judge Hayden Zacky of the Superior Court of Los Angeles, that serves as a powerful reminder of why a meticulous defense is your most important asset.
The Charges: A Two-Pronged Attack
Matthew’s client stood trial for two separate misdemeanor counts stemming from an incident in Los Angeles County :
1. Count 1: Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) – Driving under the influence of an alcoholic beverage.
2. Count 2: Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) – Driving with a .08% or higher blood alcohol content (BAC).
In California, prosecutors almost always file both charges. One focuses on impairment (how you were driving and performing on tests), while the other is a “per se” charge based strictly on the chemistry of your blood or breath. To win, the defense must dismantle both theories of the crime.
The Trial: 45 Minutes to Justice
Trial work is often about the “long game”—many months of motions, evidence discovery, and strategy—culminating in a few high-pressure hours in front of a jury.
The Los Angeles jury trial lasted 5 days. However, after Defense Attorney Matthew Ruff rested and both sides delivered their closing arguments, the case was handed to the jury. The timeline of their deliberation speaks volumes about the clarity and strength of the defense presented:
• 2:50 P.M.: The jury retires to the jury room to commence deliberations.
• 3:35 P.M.: The jury informs the court they have reached a verdict.
In just 45 minutes, the jury reviewed the evidence, discussed the facts, and reached a unanimous conclusion.
The Result: NOT GUILTY on All Counts
At 3:40 P.M., the foreperson from Juror Seat #9 delivered the words every defendant hopes to hear:
“We, the jury… find the defendant, NOT GUILTY of the crime of driving under the influence… and NOT GUILTY of the crime of driving with a .08% or higher blood alcohol content.”
Disposition: ACQUITTED BY JURY.
Why This Case Matters
This acquittal wasn’t just a “lucky break.” It was the result of a defense strategy that likely challenged the reliability of the chemical testing and the subjective nature of the “impairment” observations made by the arresting officers.
When a jury returns a verdict this quickly, it often means the prosecution’s case was systematically dismantled to the point where “reasonable doubt” became an absolute certainty.
Facing DUI Charges? Don’t Go It Alone.
This case proves that a DUI charge is not a conviction. With the right legal representation, even “tough” cases involving chemical evidence can be won. Top Tier Torrance DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff has spent over 30 years ensuring that “Not Guilty” isn’t just a possibility—it’s the goal.
If you or a loved one are facing similar charges, remember that the burden of proof is on the State, and a dedicated defense can level the playing field.
Contact Matthew Ruff, DUI Attorney today for a consultation.
