Tag Archives: Matthew ruff wins case by exposing the truth

The prosecution’s case against Matthew’s client seemed airtight, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.25%—exceeding the legal limit. Yet, through meticulous scrutiny, DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff unveiled a critical flaw: the arresting officer lacked formal training and certification for the breath test device in question. This oversight exposed a systemic issue within California’s Title 17 regulations, casting doubt on the validity of the high BAC readings. Ultimately, the prosecution’s evidence crumbled, and the administrative action against the driver was dismissed, underscoring the importance of proper training and adherence to legal procedures. Continue reading →