Tag Archives: Matthew ruff case results

How a California DUI Attorney Exposed a Blank Timeline and Won an “Impossible” .20% Case

Imagine receiving a call from the DMV about a suspension of your client’s license after police discovered them passed out in a car with a 0.20% BAC. At first glance, it seems like a straightforward case for the state. However, as California DUI defense attorney Matthew Ruff recently demonstrated, even the most extreme chemical test results don’t hold water if the police don’t establish the most basic foundation required by law: the time of driving. In a recent DUI Administrative Per Se (APS) hearing, attorney Matthew Ruff successfully exposed glaring evidentiary gaps in a Torrance Police Department investigation, forcing the DMV to issue a complete Order of Set Aside and fully reinstate the licensee’s driving privileges. Ruff dismantled this Continue reading

Posted in criminal, DMV, DUI, Legal Resources, Torrance Judges, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Case Victory: DUI Charges Dismissed in Los Angeles Superior Court

When facing a DUI in Los Angeles, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Conviction for driving under the influence carries mandatory fines, programs, and a permanent criminal record. However, as demonstrated by Matthew Ruff’s recent case at the Los Angeles Metropolitan Courthouse, the right legal strategy can transform a dire situation into a manageable resolution. In this case, our client was charged with two serious counts under the California Vehicle Code: VC 23152(a) and VC 23152(b). Despite strong evidence, Matthew Ruff’s forensic review and negotiation led to full DUI dismissals and a reduction to reckless driving. Continue reading

Posted in criminal, DMV, DUI, Legal Resources, Torrance Judges, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The “Weaving” Myth: How DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff Won a 0.15% BAC Case

Top DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff’s recent triumph in overturning a license suspension highlights his strategic defense of constitutional rights. Despite a 0.15% B.A.C., Ruff argued that mere lane weaving does not meet the legal threshold for a traffic stop. By focusing on the Solovij standard, he ensured that officers must have ‘reasonable suspicion’ of criminal activity before pulling someone over. His defense underscores the importance of accountability in law enforcement practices. Continue reading

Posted in criminal, DMV, DUI, Legal Resources, Torrance Judges, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment